lobbyTO

Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson

1880-1890 Eglinton Ave E

Registrations naming this address
9
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
195
16 offices contacted
Applications at this address
6
12 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Location
43.72552, -79.29948
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

9

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Office of the Mayor57
  • Legal Services56
  • Ward 21 Scarborough Centre29
  • Office of Councillor Michael Thompson (Ward 21)23
  • City Manager's Office10
  • Office of Councillor Thompson, Ward 214
  • Mayor3
  • Housing Secretariat2
Data table· 16 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of the MayorCouncillor staff57425 July 2022
Legal ServicesCity staff56316 July 2021
Ward 21 Scarborough CentreMember of council291914 January 2021
Office of Councillor Michael Thompson (Ward 21)Councillor staff23181 April 2021
City Manager's OfficeCity staff1018 March 2021
Office of Councillor Thompson, Ward 21Councillor staff4016 July 2020
MayorMember of council3312 February 2021
Housing SecretariatCity staff218 March 2021
Municipal Licensing & StandardsCity staff228 March 2021
Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9Councillor staff2028 October 2020
Office of Councillor Gary Crawford (Ward 20)Councillor staff2010 March 2021
Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 9Councillor staff106 October 2020
Office of Councillor NunziataCouncillor staff108 January 2021
Office of The MayorCouncillor staff101 June 2021
Ward 11 University-RosedaleMember of council1012 July 2022
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council116 March 2017
All registrations· 9 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM31129Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan15 January 2021 – 13 January 20234
SM30661CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastPlanning and Development Application; Official Plan1 October 2020 – 31 December 20214
SM30344Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan16 July 2020 – 17 January 202252
SM30289Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan9 July 2020 – 27 January 202346
SM30290Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan9 July 2020 – 14 December 20208
SM30291Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan9 July 2020 – 8 July 202255
SM30292Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan9 July 2020 – 8 July 20221
SM30315Choice Properties1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue EastEconomic Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan9 July 2020 – 16 January 202324
SM24105Choice PROPERTIES REIT1880-1890 Eglinton Ave EastPlanning and Development Application, Official Plan24 February 2017 – 6 June 20201

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

6
Data table· 6 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
A0004/25SC
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)26 November 2024Closed
Approved
22 110353 ESC 21 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)3 February 2022Under Review
In progress
22 109282 ESC 21 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)31 January 2022Under Review
In progress
20 209175 ESC 21 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)21 October 2020Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 209194 ESC 21 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)21 October 2020OMB Approved
Approved
16 269853 ESC 37 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)22 December 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 21

3 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 21: 3 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied3Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21

10 lobbied · 44 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21: 10 lobbied and 44 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied44Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21

15 lobbied · 21 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21: 15 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied15Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied21Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 21

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 21: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.