Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0004/25SC

Ward 21 · Michael ThompsonDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 26 November 2024; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 1880-1890 Eglinton Ave E
Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted: 26 November 2024
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 4 June 2025
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To alter the development standards for the 32-storey mixed use building (F1) by altering the by-law language for gross construction area, setback, step back or separation distance encroachment and location of long term bicycle parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Choice Properties
SM31129 · 15 January 2021 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited
SM30661 · 1 October 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30344 · 16 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30289 · 9 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30290 · 9 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30291 · 9 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30292 · 9 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice Properties
SM30315 · 9 July 2020 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Avenue East”
Choice PROPERTIES REIT
SM24105 · 24 February 2017 · “1880-1890 Eglinton Ave East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 21

3 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 21: 3 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	3	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.