lobbyTO

Registration SM25693 · consultant

The Alterra Group of Companies

Status: closed26 February 2018 to 22 September 2020Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
The Alterra Group of Companies
Consultant firm
Bousfields Inc.
Registrant
Sasha Lauzon
Type
consultant
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 27 February 2018; 26 February 2018 to 22 September 2020

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

To discuss Site plan application in support of redevelopment of 520 Richmond St. W.

Addresses named: 520 Richmond St W (Ward 10)

Automated summary of the registration text

registered, communicating about Site plan application in support of redevelopment of 520 Richmond St. W.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2018-02 to 2018-02

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1126 February 2018
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
26 February 2018Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaJoe Cressy
Member of council
—Meeting—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored