Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
520 Richmond St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64750, -79.39976
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 7 | 7 | 26 February 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Vaughan, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 27 January 2014 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 26 June 2015 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27487 | Alterra Developments 2000 Limited | 520 Richmond Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium; Planning and Development Application, Si… | 30 January 2019 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM25693 | The Alterra Group of Companies | 520 Richmond St. W. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 26 February 2018 – 22 September 2020 | 1 |
| SM19602 | The Alterra Group of Companies | 520 Richmond St. W. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 27 August 2013 – 1 August 2017 | 3 |
| SM17800 | The Alterra Group of Companies | 520 Richmond Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 13 February 2012 – 1 February 2024 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 3 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 220953 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 July 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 198847 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 November 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 279689 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 220953 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 198847 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 July 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 279689 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 15 November 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
520 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 198847 STE 20 SA · submitted 14 July 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25693 (The Alterra Group of Companies)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25693: To discuss Site plan application in support of redevelopment of 520 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 198847 STE 20 SA at 520 Richmond St W: Development proposal for a 15-storey mixed-use building containing 125 residential units, commercial uses at grade and 26 parking spaces below grade. The building will have a height of 45 metres (with a small elevator projection above) and a gross floor area of 8,794 square metres. The zoning amend… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To discuss Site plan application in support of redevelopment of 520 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
520 Richmond St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 198847 STE 20 SA · submitted 14 July 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27487 (Alterra Developments 2000 Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27487: Pursuing development approvals and building permits for 520 Richmond Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 198847 STE 20 SA at 520 Richmond St W: Development proposal for a 15-storey mixed-use building containing 125 residential units, commercial uses at grade and 26 parking spaces below grade. The building will have a height of 45 metres (with a small elevator projection above) and a gross floor area of 8,794 square metres. The zoning amend… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pursuing development approvals and building permits for 520 Richmond Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
2 Augusta Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 279689 STE 20 OZ · submitted 15 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM19602 (The Alterra Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19602: 520 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 279689 STE 20 OZ at 2 Augusta Ave: Revised Zoning Amendment application to redevelop the site with a 15-storey mixed-use building containing 125 residential units, commercial uses at grade and 25 parking spaces below grade. The building will have a height of 45 metres, including the sunken mechanical penthouse. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 520 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 520 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.