lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 183828 ESC 25 SA

0 Morningside Ave; 2270 Morningside Ave

Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
13 July 2021
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
24
12 meetings · 9 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
0 Morningside Ave; 2270 Morningside Ave
Ward
Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
Submitted
13 July 2021
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
15,955 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

5-storey commercial office building with ground floor retail and a drive-thru restaurant (15,954.7 m2 of GFA); Building B: 1-storey retail building (1,408.5 m2); and 293 parking spaces (159 surface and 134 below grade).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 24 communications · 12 meetings · 9 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Jennifer McKelvie6
  • Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge Park5
  • Jennifer McKelvie5
  • Councillor McKelvie, Ward 252
  • Economic Development & Culture1
  • Councillor McKelvie1
  • Office of Councillor McKelvie1
  • Ward 9 Davenport1
Data table· 10 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Jennifer McKelvieMember of council6221 February 2024
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council534 July 2022
Jennifer McKelvieCouncillor staff5221 February 2024
Councillor McKelvie, Ward 25Councillor staff219 May 2022
Economic Development & CultureCity staff1018 January 2023
Councillor McKelvieCouncillor staff119 February 2022
Office of Councillor McKelvieCouncillor staff1125 October 2021
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1115 March 2022
Brad BradfordMember of council114 July 2023
Vincent CrisantiMember of council104 July 2023

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25

4 lobbied · 18 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25: 4 lobbied and 18 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied18Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.