Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
0 Morningside Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.64590, -79.47315
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 1 MORNINGSIDE AVE (1 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 13 July 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 183828 ESC 25 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 14 April 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0208/21SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 29 August 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 213540 ESC 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 March 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0082/17SCApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 183828 ESC 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 July 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| A0208/21SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 April 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 19 213540 ESC 25 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 August 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0082/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 March 2017 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2270 Morningside Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 183828 ESC 25 SA · submitted 13 July 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM32221 (Roniso Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32221: Development application located at 2270 Morningside Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 183828 ESC 25 SA at 2270 Morningside Ave: 5-storey commercial office building with ground floor retail and a drive-thru restaurant (15,954.7 m2 of GFA); Building B: 1-storey retail building (1,408.5 m2); and 293 parking spaces (159 surface and 134 below grade). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application located at 2270 Morningside Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 2270 MORNINGSIDE AVE
- application_address
- 2270 MORNINGSIDE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.