lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ

158 Sterling Rd; 164 Sterling Rd; 181 Sterling Rd; 200 Sterling Rd

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
28 June 2011
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
24
22 meetings · 17 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
158 Sterling Rd; 164 Sterling Rd; 181 Sterling Rd; 200 Sterling Rd
Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted
28 June 2011
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application for the entire site has also been submitted to allow for the residential uses and the additional height and density.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 24 communications · 22 meetings · 17 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore3
  • Economic Development & Culture2
  • Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence2
  • Ward 18 Davenport2
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
  • Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest2
  • Deputy City Manager's Office1
  • Mayor's Office1
Data table· 17 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council3319 October 2013
Economic Development & CultureCity staff2229 June 2012
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council2229 October 2012
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council2222 October 2012
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council2225 October 2012
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council2224 October 2012
Deputy City Manager's OfficeCity staff1129 June 2012
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff1112 November 2012
Office of Councillor Del GrandeCouncillor staff1019 November 2012
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1123 October 2012
Ward 14 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council1112 June 2012
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1117 May 2012
Ward 2 Etobicoke NorthMember of council114 July 2012
Ward 23 WillowdaleMember of council1114 June 2012
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1123 November 2012
Ward 33 Don Valley EastMember of council1123 October 2012
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council1026 November 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9

19 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9: 19 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.