Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
181 Sterling Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65501, -79.44452
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 9 | 5 | 28 February 2022 |
| Alejandra Bravo | Member of council | 6 | 5 | 13 January 2025 |
| Ward 9 | Councillor staff | 5 | 2 | 28 February 2022 |
| Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 8 November 2021 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM32372 | Marlin Spring Developments | 181 Sterling Road | Planning and Development | 22 September 2021 – 31 December 2025 | 9 |
| SM29471 | Marlin Spring Developments | 181 Sterling Road | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 1 February 2020 – 31 December 2025 | 12 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
9- Submitted 24 January 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0087/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 August 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 204477 STE 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 August 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0703/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 26 November 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 242233 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 December 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0001/21TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 207271 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 February 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 115056 STE 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 August 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0079/18TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 28 June 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 9 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0087/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 24 January 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 204477 STE 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 27 August 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0703/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 August 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 21 242233 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 November 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0001/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 December 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 20 207271 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 115056 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 February 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0079/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 16 August 2018 | Closed Withdrawn |
| 11 228729 STE 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 June 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
181 Sterling Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0087/25TEY · submitted 24 January 2025 · Closed · from registration SM29471 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29471: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0087/25TEY at 181 Sterling Rd: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 943-2015 (OMB), for a new 17-storey mixed-use building with 266 dwelling units, 2 retail units and 84 parking spaces within 2 levels of below grade garages (Block 4B) which is currently under construction, by reducing… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B).
Matched fields
- address
- 181 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 181 STERLING RD
181 Sterling Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0703/23TEY · submitted 14 August 2023 · Closed · from registration SM29471 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29471: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0703/23TEY at 181 Sterling Rd: To alter the development standards, as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 943-2015 (OMB), which include adding an additional storey, changes to the overall height, setbacks, and parking standards, for the approved 16-storey mixed-use building (currently under construction). (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B).
Matched fields
- address
- 181 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 181 STERLING RD
181 Sterling Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0001/21TEY · submitted 3 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM29471 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29471: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0001/21TEY at 181 Sterling Rd: To construct a 16-storey mixed-use building, containing 254 residential dwelling units, and underground parking, consisting of two levels. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B).
Matched fields
- address
- 181 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 181 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 115056 STE 09 SA · submitted 12 February 2020 · Closed · from registration SM29471 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29471: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 115056 STE 09 SA at 158 Sterling Rd: Site Plan Approval application for a proposed 16-storey mixed-use building comprised of 1146 m² of non-residential gross floor area and 254 residential dwelling units. Two levels of below grade parking providing 84 parking spaces will be provided on the lot. Block 4B (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B).
Matched fields
- address
- 181 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 181 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18013 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18013: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use.
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18072 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18072: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use.
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18077 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18077: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19677 (ROI Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19677: 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.