Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
158 Sterling Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65465, -79.44526
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
8These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 16 | 14 | 3 October 2017 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 8 November 2012 |
| Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 18 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 25 October 2016 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 7 November 2011 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 17 May 2021 |
All registrations· 8 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30716 | Rio Tinto Alcan | 158 Sterling Road | Environment; Planning and Development, Environmental Assessment | 14 October 2020 – 31 December 2020 | 0 |
| SM24465 | Castlepoint Studio Partners | 158 Sterling Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 3 May 2017 – 18 December 2024 | 0 |
| SM18668 | Castlepoint Studio Partners | 158 Sterling Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 November 2012 – 31 December 2012 | 1 |
| SM18571 | CAW-Canada | 158 Sterling Road | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 18 October 2012 – 31 December 2013 | 0 |
| SM16444 | Castlepoint Studio Properties Limited | 158 Sterling Road | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 26 May 2012 – 21 April 2013 | 1 |
| SM17739 | Rio Tinto Alcan | 158 Sterling Road | Environment; Planning and Development, Environmental Assessment | 27 January 2012 – 31 December 2014 | 0 |
| SM17405 | Castlepoint Studio Partners | 158 Sterling Road | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 November 2011 – 19 December 2026 | 14 |
| SM16075 | Castlepoint Studio Partners | 158 Sterling Road. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 21 March 2011 – 28 April 2017 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
18- Submitted 25 June 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 169956 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 June 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 168035 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 May 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 156482 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 15 August 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 191025 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 16 October 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 207271 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 February 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 115056 STE 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 November 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 250319 STE 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 278413 STE 18 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2017Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 17 278429 STE 18 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 September 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0098/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 July 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0784/17TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 7 March 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 125434 STE 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 January 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0111/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 31 January 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4099936Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 2 March 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 122757 STE 18 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 March 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0014/16TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 9 August 2012Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 12 226212 STE 18 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 June 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 18 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 169956 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 June 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 24 168035 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 June 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 24 156482 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 May 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 191025 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 August 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 207271 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 115056 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 February 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 250319 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 278413 STE 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 21 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 278429 STE 18 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 21 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0098/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 28 September 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0784/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 July 2017 | Closed Withdrawn |
| 17 125434 STE 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 March 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0111/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 31 January 2017 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4099936 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 31 January 2017 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 16 122757 STE 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 March 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0014/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 2 March 2016 | Closed Approved |
| 12 226212 STE 18 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 9 August 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 228729 STE 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 June 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
158 Sterling Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 115056 STE 09 SA · submitted 12 February 2020 · Closed · from registration SM29471 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29471: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B). (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 115056 STE 09 SA at 158 Sterling Rd: Site Plan Approval application for a proposed 16-storey mixed-use building comprised of 1146 m² of non-residential gross floor area and 254 residential dwelling units. Two levels of below grade parking providing 84 parking spaces will be provided on the lot. Block 4B (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan and minor variance application for 181 Sterling Road (Block 4B).
Matched fields
- address
- 181 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 181 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18013 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18013: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use.
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18072 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18072: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use.
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18077 (Nestle Canada Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18077: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road and change the lands from employment use to mixed-use
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
158 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 228729 STE 18 OZ · submitted 28 June 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19677 (ROI Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19677: 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 228729 STE 18 OZ at 158 Sterling Rd: These applications have been refused by City Council. OPA and Rezoning application for mixed use lot. OPA (site specific) application for entire site to create new mixed use development with a mix of employment and residential based uses. Six blocks are proposed to be created. Rezoning application … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 158, 164, 181 and 200 Sterling Road, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 200 STERLING RD
- application_address
- 200 STERLING RD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 158 Sterling Road (Blocks 5B, 5C and 5D) and 190 Sterling Road (Block 3B) - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval2025.TE21.4 · 24 April 2025
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 9
1 lobbied · 3 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.