Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
429 Walmer Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68545, -79.41237
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Matlow | Councillor staff | 7 | 5 | 27 September 2022 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 27 September 2022 |
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 9 June 2017 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33610 | STAFFORD WALMER INC | 429 WALMER ROAD | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application | 2 September 2022 – 2 September 2023 | 9 |
| SM33490 | Stafford Developments | 429 Walmer Road. | Planning and Development Application | 26 July 2022 – 31 December 2022 | 0 |
| SM24591 | All Seniors Care | 429 Walmer Road | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Minor Va… | 18 May 2017 – 14 June 2019 | 1 |
| SM24557 | All Seniors Care | 429 Walmer Rd | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 12 May 2017 – 31 December 2018 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 23 June 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0489/26TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 January 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0031/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 August 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 192577 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 18 August 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 192578 STE 12 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0489/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 June 2026 | Closed Approved |
| A0031/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 January 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 22 192577 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 August 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 192578 STE 12 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 August 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
429 Walmer Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 192577 STE 12 SA · submitted 18 August 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33490 (Stafford Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33490: planning application for redevelopment of 429 Walmer Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 192577 STE 12 SA at 429 Walmer Rd: May 2023 resubmission: The application has been revised as follows: A 73.5 metre (19-storey inclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building is proposed with 17,930 square metres of gross floor area of which 200 square metres is non-residential. 98 residential units and 139 parking spaces are … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: planning application for redevelopment of 429 Walmer Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 429 WALMER RD
- application_address
- 429 WALMER RD
429 Walmer Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 192577 STE 12 SA · submitted 18 August 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33610 (STAFFORD WALMER INC)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33610: 429 WALMER ROAD ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 192577 STE 12 SA at 429 Walmer Rd: May 2023 resubmission: The application has been revised as follows: A 73.5 metre (19-storey inclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building is proposed with 17,930 square metres of gross floor area of which 200 square metres is non-residential. 98 residential units and 139 parking spaces are … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 429 WALMER ROAD ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION
Matched fields
- address
- 429 WALMER RD
- application_address
- 429 WALMER RD
429 Walmer Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 192578 STE 12 OZ · submitted 18 August 2022 · Closed · from registration SM33490 (Stafford Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33490: planning application for redevelopment of 429 Walmer Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 192578 STE 12 OZ at 429 Walmer Rd: May 2023 resubmission: The application has been revised as follows: A 73.5 metre (19-storey nclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building is proposed with 17,930 square metres of gross floor area of which 200 square metres is non-residential. 98 residential units and 139 parking spaces are p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: planning application for redevelopment of 429 Walmer Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 429 WALMER RD
- application_address
- 429 WALMER RD
429 Walmer Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 192578 STE 12 OZ · submitted 18 August 2022 · Closed · from registration SM33610 (STAFFORD WALMER INC)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33610: 429 WALMER ROAD ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 192578 STE 12 OZ at 429 Walmer Rd: May 2023 resubmission: The application has been revised as follows: A 73.5 metre (19-storey nclusive of mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building is proposed with 17,930 square metres of gross floor area of which 200 square metres is non-residential. 98 residential units and 139 parking spaces are p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 429 WALMER ROAD ZONING BYLAW AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION
Matched fields
- address
- 429 WALMER RD
- application_address
- 429 WALMER RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.