lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 122757 STE 18 SA

12 Perth Ave; 14 Perth Ave; 16 Perth Ave; 18 Perth Ave; 20 Perth Ave; 22 Perth Ave; 24 Perth Ave; 26 Perth Ave; 28 Perth Ave; 30 Perth Ave; 32 Perth Ave; 34 Perth Ave; 36 Perth Ave; 38 Perth Ave; 40 Perth Ave; 42 Perth Ave; 44 Perth Ave; 46 Perth Ave; 48 Perth Ave; 50 Perth Ave; 52 Perth Ave; 54 Perth Ave; 56 Perth Ave; 58 Perth Ave; 60 Perth Ave; 62A Perth Ave; 62B Perth Ave; 64A Perth Ave; 64B Perth Ave; 66A Perth Ave; 66B Perth Ave; 68A Perth Ave; 68B Perth Ave; 158 Sterling Rd

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
2 March 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
12 Perth Ave; 14 Perth Ave; 16 Perth Ave; 18 Perth Ave; 20 Perth Ave; 22 Perth Ave; 24 Perth Ave; 26 Perth Ave; 28 Perth Ave; 30 Perth Ave; 32 Perth Ave; 34 Perth Ave; 36 Perth Ave; 38 Perth Ave; 40 Perth Ave; 42 Perth Ave; 44 Perth Ave; 46 Perth Ave; 48 Perth Ave; 50 Perth Ave; 52 Perth Ave; 54 Perth Ave; 56 Perth Ave; 58 Perth Ave; 60 Perth Ave; 62A Perth Ave; 62B Perth Ave; 64A Perth Ave; 64B Perth Ave; 66A Perth Ave; 66B Perth Ave; 68A Perth Ave; 68B Perth Ave; 158 Sterling Rd
Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted
2 March 2016
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
11 228729 STE 18 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Application proposes to redevelop Block 1 with 32 three-bedroom townhouse units organized within four townhouse blocks. The units will front onto Perth Avenue with typical lot frontages of 4 metres (or approximately 14 feet). The maximum height of the proposed development is 12 metres alongPerth Avenue and 13 metres to the rear of the site. Each unit will include one vehicular parking space, which will be located within integrated garages at the rear, and accessed via a private driveway along the western end of the block. A total of 977 square metres oflandscaped open space is proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

20 lobbied · 21 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9: 20 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=4)0%0%0.05
Matched, unlobbied21—100% (n=5)0%0%0.10
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.