lobbyTO

Registration SM28425 · consultant

1252662 Ontario Inc.

Status: closed by lro18 June 2019 to 7 May 2022Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
1252662 Ontario Inc.
Consultant firm
Wood Bull LLP
Registrant
Angela Fang
Type
consultant
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 19 June 2019; 18 June 2019 to 7 May 2022

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street

Addresses named: 50 Marmora St (Ward 7)

Automated summary of the registration text

Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2019-06 to 2019-06

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 7 Humber River-Black CreekMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 7 Humber River-Black CreekMember of council1119 June 2019
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
19 June 2019Ward 7 Humber River-Black CreekAnthony Perruzza
Member of council
—Meeting—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored