Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 18 224884 WET 07 SA

Ward 7 · Anthony PerruzzaDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 13 September 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 5 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 50 Marmora St; 60 Marmora St
Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted: 13 September 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

A proposal to amend the existing site plan approval under Application No. 06 179079 WET 07 SA. Proposal includes the conversion of basement parking area to production space (6946 sq. m), a two storey addition to the north side of the building (955 sq. m), an addition to the east side of the building (3014 sq. m) and the addition of a two-storey open equipment platform to the southeast side of the building. Also proposed are changes to the loading docks, parking and garbage enclosure.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1252662 Ontario Inc. · registration SM28424
Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28424: Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 224884 WET 07 SA at 60 Marmora St: A proposal to amend the existing site plan approval under Application No. 06 179079 WET 07 SA. Proposal includes the conversion of basement parking area to production space (6946 sq. m), a two storey addition to the north side of the building (955 sq. m), an addition to the east side of the buildin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street
Matched fields
address
50 MARMORA ST
application_address
50 MARMORA ST
1252662 Ontario Inc. · registration SM28425
Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28425: Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 224884 WET 07 SA at 60 Marmora St: A proposal to amend the existing site plan approval under Application No. 06 179079 WET 07 SA. Proposal includes the conversion of basement parking area to production space (6946 sq. m), a two storey addition to the north side of the building (955 sq. m), an addition to the east side of the buildin… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to amend existing site plan agreement for 50 Marmora Street
Matched fields
address
50 MARMORA ST
application_address
50 MARMORA ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 5 communications · 5 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek2
Anthony Perruzza2
Ward 6 York Centre1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek	Member of council	2	2	19 June 2019
Anthony Perruzza	Member of council	2	2	29 September 2023
Ward 6 York Centre	Member of council	1	1	6 January 2021

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Wood Bull LLP2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7

5 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 7: 5 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.