Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0645/21EYK
- Status
- Closed
- Refused
- Submitted
- 13 December 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 110 Industry St
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Submitted
- 13 December 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Refused
- Hearing date
- 29 September 2022
- Decision
- Refused
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To permit the existing open-air outdoor storage facility.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
URROS Investments Inc · registration SM32988
110 Industry St. MLS Notice of Violation; Committee of Adjustment Application Hearing to get temporary relief of Zoning By-Law; including future land uses.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32988: 110 Industry St. MLS Notice of Violation; Committee of Adjustment Application Hearing to get temporary relief of Zoning By-Law; including future land uses. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0645/21EYK at 110 Industry St: To permit the existing open-air outdoor storage facility. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 110 Industry St. MLS Notice of Violation; Committee of Adjustment Application Hearing to get temporary relief of Zoning By-Law; includin…
Matched fields
- address
- 110 INDUSTRY ST
- application_address
- 110 INDUSTRY ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- URROS Investments IncSM37803 · 20 July 2026 · “110 Industry Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 5
8 lobbied · 137 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 137 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.