Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
110 Industry St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.69297, -79.49169
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Nunziata | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 21 July 2026 |
| Frances Nunziata | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 21 July 2026 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM37803 | URROS Investments Inc | 110 Industry Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 20 July 2026 – 1 July 2027 | 2 |
| SM32988 | URROS Investments Inc | 110 Industry St. | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 25 February 2022 – 30 November 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 21 August 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 214093 WET 05 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 December 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0645/21EYKClosed · Refused
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 214093 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 August 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| A0645/21EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 December 2021 | Closed Refused |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
110 Industry St · Minor variance (MV)
A0645/21EYK · submitted 13 December 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32988 (URROS Investments Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32988: 110 Industry St. MLS Notice of Violation; Committee of Adjustment Application Hearing to get temporary relief of Zoning By-Law; including future land uses. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0645/21EYK at 110 Industry St: To permit the existing open-air outdoor storage facility. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 110 Industry St. MLS Notice of Violation; Committee of Adjustment Application Hearing to get temporary relief of Zoning By-Law; includin…
Matched fields
- address
- 110 INDUSTRY ST
- application_address
- 110 INDUSTRY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 5
8 lobbied · 137 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 137 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.