Development application 25 216777 NNY 06 OZ

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

• Equiton Development Inc · registration SM37711

  The work is to support the Planning application's successful passage at City Council. The municipal address is 1 - 11 Vinci Cres. M3H 2Y6

  Evidence High confidence · score 0.91

  A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.

  Source records

  • Registration SM37711: The work is to support the Planning application's successful passage at City Council. The municipal address is 1 - 11 Vinci Cres. M3H 2Y6 (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Development application 25 216777 NNY 06 OZ at 3 Vinci Cres: OPA & Rezoning Application to redevelop the site with a 14-storey residential building that contemplates 299 new units with a total proposed gross floor area of 23,373.34 square metres and a total proposed density of 7.03 times the area of the lot. The proposed unit mix will incorporate 67 one-bedr… (Development Applications)

  Matched text

  • particulars: The work is to support the Planning application's successful passage at City Council. The municipal address is 1 - 11 Vinci Cres. M3H 2Y6

  Matched fields

  address

  1-11 VINCI CRES

  application_address

  1 VINCI CRES

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 31 communications · 1 meeting · 24 offices contacted

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.