lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 25 150383 STE 19 OZ

1684 Queen St E; 1698 Queen St E; 1700 Queen St E; 1702 Queen St E

Status
Council Approved
Approved
Submitted
28 April 2025
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
57
13 meetings · 24 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1684 Queen St E; 1698 Queen St E; 1700 Queen St E; 1702 Queen St E
Ward
Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Submitted
28 April 2025
Status
Council Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
168 units; 14,850 m² gross floor area
Related file
19 242696 STE 19 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment for a 10-storey mixed-use building with a height of 34.95 metres (plus a 5.5 metre mechanical penthouse). The proposed building will include approximately 1,184 square metres of non-residential space and 14,850 square metres of residential gross floor area, including 168 rental units including three affordable rental units. The proposal also seeks to permit one level of underground parking with 54 vehicular parking spaces and 186 bicycle parking spaces. A future realignment of Penny Lane providing access on the north end of the site from the underground level to Orchard Park Boulevard and closing the eastern portion of Penny Lane is also proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 57 communications · 13 meetings · 24 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 25 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Brad BradfordCouncillor staff20525 March 2026
Brad BradfordMember of council14720 March 2026
Alejandra BravoMember of council1021 March 2026
Amber MorleyMember of council1023 March 2026
Anthony PerruzzaMember of council1023 March 2026
Ausma MalikMember of council1021 March 2026
Chris MoiseMember of council1021 March 2026
Dianne SaxeMember of council1021 March 2026
Frances NunziataMember of council1021 March 2026
Gord PerksMember of council1126 March 2026
Jamaal MyersMember of council1021 March 2026
James PasternakMember of council1023 March 2026
Jon BurnsideMember of council1023 March 2026
Josh MatlowMember of council1023 March 2026
Lily ChengMember of council1021 March 2026
Michael ThompsonMember of council1023 March 2026
Mike ColleMember of council1023 March 2026
Neethan ShanMember of council1021 March 2026
Nick MantasMember of council1023 March 2026
Olivia ChowCouncillor staff1023 March 2026
Paul AinslieMember of council1021 March 2026
Rachel Chernos LinMember of council1021 March 2026
Shelley CarrollMember of council1023 March 2026
Stephen HolydayMember of council1023 March 2026
Vincent CrisantiMember of council1023 March 2026

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19

7 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19: 7 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.