lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 218252 STE 10 SA

2 Cooper Street; 15 Cooper St; 15 Freeland St; 33 Freeland St; 43 Freeland St; 53 Freeland Street; 55 Lake Shore Blvd E; 95 Lake Shore Blvd E

Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
9 September 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
8
2 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
2 Cooper Street; 15 Cooper St; 15 Freeland St; 33 Freeland St; 43 Freeland St; 53 Freeland Street; 55 Lake Shore Blvd E; 95 Lake Shore Blvd E
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
9 September 2019
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
2,570 units; 171,950 m² gross floor area
Related file
16 152742 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval application to facilitate the development of Block 4 of the former LCBO lands, part of the comprehensively planned Lower Yonge Precinct. Blocks 1 and 2 of the LCBO lands are already under development, and Block 3 has been conveyed as a City Park. The proposal is comprised of 3 towers having heights of 70, 78, and 85 storeys atop individual mixed-use podiums. The north building includes a 990 m² daycare and space for a 5,613 m² elementary public school, both to be located in the existing heritage building on site. A total of 1,753 m² of non-residential floor area is proposed as well as 171,950 m² of residential GFA, resulting in 2,570 residential units including 178 affordable housing units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 8 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 3 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Transportation ServicesCity staff528 July 2022
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff2010 February 2022
Olivia ChowMember of council1013 April 2025

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied165—100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.