Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
2 Cooper Street
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64379, -79.37152
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 15 COOPER ST (13 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 4 | 5 April 2018 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 20 January 2014 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 1 | 1 | 12 February 2014 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 12 February 2014 |
| Pam McConnell | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 20 January 2014 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 12 February 2014 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 12 February 2014 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22338 | Menkes Developments Ltd | 2 Cooper Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 16 October 2015 – 16 October 2019 | 2 |
| SM20024 | Greenland Group (Canada) | 2 Cooper Street | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 19 January 2014 – 1 January 2015 | 2 |
| SM20025 | Greenland Group (Canada) | 2 Cooper Street | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 19 January 2014 – 1 January 2015 | 2 |
| SM20897 | Greenland Group (Canada) | 2 Cooper Street. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 19 January 2014 – 1 January 2015 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 9 September 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 218252 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270590 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270602 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 152742 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 218252 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 9 September 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 16 270590 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 270602 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 152742 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 May 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
55 Lake Shore Blvd E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 218252 STE 10 SA · submitted 9 September 2019 · Under Review · from registration SM32399 (Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32399: PATH Connections at 55 Lake Shore Blvd East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 218252 STE 10 SA at 55 Lake Shore Blvd E: Site Plan Approval application to facilitate the development of Block 4 of the former LCBO lands, part of the comprehensively planned Lower Yonge Precinct. Blocks 1 and 2 of the LCBO lands are already under development, and Block 3 has been conveyed as a City Park. The proposal is comprised of 3 to… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: PATH Connections at 55 Lake Shore Blvd East
Matched fields
- address
- 55 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
- application_address
- 55 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
2 Cooper St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 152742 STE 28 OZ · submitted 9 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22338 (Menkes Developments Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22338: 2 Cooper Street 15 to 53 Freeland Street 55 and 95 Lake Shore Blvd 15 Queens Quay (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 152742 STE 28 OZ at 2 Cooper St: This application is for an OPA/Rezoning application on the former LCBO lands to permit a mixed-use development, including a new office/retail building, 6 mixed-use buildings and a public park. The applications proposes to divide the property into 4 blocks, with the eastward extension of Harbour Str… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2 Cooper Street 15 to 53 Freeland Street 55 and 95 Lake Shore Blvd 15 Queens Quay
Matched fields
- address
- 2 COOPER ST
- application_address
- 2 COOPER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.