Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

55 Lake Shore Blvd E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 4; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 23; 7 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 12; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 1; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64465, -79.37306
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36313 · 28 January 20259
Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM32399 · 6 October 20218
Menkes Developments LtdSM36584 · 28 April 20254
Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36592 · 29 April 20252

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Transportation Services5
Olivia Chow5
Olivia Chow5
Development Review4
Mayor John Tory2
Housing Secretariat1
CreateTO1

Data table· 7 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Transportation Services	City staff	5	2	8 July 2022
Olivia Chow	Councillor staff	5	0	3 November 2025
Olivia Chow	Member of council	5	4	29 April 2025
Development Review	City staff	4	0	3 November 2025
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	2	0	10 February 2022
Housing Secretariat	City staff	1	0	27 February 2025
CreateTO	Local board	1	1	5 June 2026

All registrations· 4 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM36592	Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.	55 Lake Shore Blvd East	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	29 April 2025 – 29 April 2027	2
SM36584	Menkes Developments Ltd	55 Lake Shore Blvd. East.	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	28 April 2025 – 31 December 2026	4
SM36313	Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.	55 Lake Shore Blvd East	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	28 January 2025 – 7 April 2026	9
SM32399	Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.	55 Lake Shore Blvd East	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	6 October 2021 – 6 October 2027	8

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 7 May 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0037/26TEYPostponed · In progress
Submitted 20 August 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0752/24TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 29 July 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0048/24TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 24 January 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 106785 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 7 January 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 101645 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 1 September 2021Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0088/21TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 9 September 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 218252 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
Submitted 11 May 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0041/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270590 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270602 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 9 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 152742 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 9 May 2016Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 16 152754 STE 28 SBDraft Plan Approved · Approved

Data table· 12 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0037/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	7 May 2026	Postponed In progress
A0752/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	20 August 2024	Closed Approved
B0048/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	29 July 2024	Closed Approved
22 106785 STE 10 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	24 January 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 101645 STE 10 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	7 January 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0088/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	1 September 2021	Closed Approved
19 218252 STE 10 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	9 September 2019	Under Review In progress
B0041/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	11 May 2019	Closed Approved
16 270590 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	23 December 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 270602 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	23 December 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 152742 STE 28 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	9 May 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 152754 STE 28 SB Development application	Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)	9 May 2016	Draft Plan Approved Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

55 Lake Shore Blvd E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 218252 STE 10 SA · submitted 9 September 2019 · Under Review · from registration SM32399 (Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32399: PATH Connections at 55 Lake Shore Blvd East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 218252 STE 10 SA at 55 Lake Shore Blvd E: Site Plan Approval application to facilitate the development of Block 4 of the former LCBO lands, part of the comprehensively planned Lower Yonge Precinct. Blocks 1 and 2 of the LCBO lands are already under development, and Block 3 has been conveyed as a City Park. The proposal is comprised of 3 to… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: PATH Connections at 55 Lake Shore Blvd East
Matched fields
address
55 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
application_address
55 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
2 Cooper St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 152742 STE 28 OZ · submitted 9 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22338 (Menkes Developments Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22338: 2 Cooper Street 15 to 53 Freeland Street 55 and 95 Lake Shore Blvd 15 Queens Quay (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 152742 STE 28 OZ at 2 Cooper St: This application is for an OPA/Rezoning application on the former LCBO lands to permit a mixed-use development, including a new office/retail building, 6 mixed-use buildings and a public park. The applications proposes to divide the property into 4 blocks, with the eastward extension of Harbour Str… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2 Cooper Street 15 to 53 Freeland Street 55 and 95 Lake Shore Blvd 15 Queens Quay
Matched fields
address
2 COOPER ST
application_address
2 COOPER ST

Council and committee items naming this address

55 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
2026.PB42.3 · 30 March 2026

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	25	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	1,881	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide