20 Perth Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 5; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 29; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Location: 43.65495, -79.44730
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM27492 · 30 January 20199
HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM29038 · 23 October 20198
HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM27464 · 29 January 20197
HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM29040 · 23 October 20195
HC Lower JCT Holdings LPSM37702 · 8 June 20260

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 9 Davenport17
Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 96
Ward 9 Davenport4
Office of Councillor Bailao2

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	17	5	19 July 2022
Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9	Councillor staff	6	0	10 December 2020
Ward 9 Davenport	Councillor staff	4	0	13 June 2022
Office of Councillor Bailao	Councillor staff	2	0	6 April 2020

All registrations· 5 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM37702	HC Lower JCT Holdings LP	20 Perth Avenue	Planning and Development; Combined Application	8 June 2026 – 31 December 2026	0
SM29038	HC Lower JCT Holdings LP	20 Perth Avenue	Planning and Development, Combined Application	23 October 2019 – 31 October 2025	8
SM29040	HC Lower JCT Holdings LP	20 Perth Avenue	Planning and Development, Combined Application	23 October 2019 – 31 December 2020	5
SM27492	HC Lower JCT Holdings LP	20 Perth Avenue.	Planning and Development, Combined Application	30 January 2019 – 31 December 2024	9
SM27464	HC Lower JCT Holdings LP	20 Perth Avenue	Planning and Development, Combined Application	29 January 2019 – 31 December 2023	7

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 21 December 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 278413 STE 18 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 2 March 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 122757 STE 18 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
17 278413 STE 18 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	21 December 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 122757 STE 18 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	2 March 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

20 lobbied · 21 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9: 20 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	20	—	100% (n=4)	0%	0%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	21	—	100% (n=5)	0%	0%	0.10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.