Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA
1 Edgewater Dr; 27 Edgewater Dr; 30 Merchants' Wharf; 80 Merchants' Wharf; 261 Queens Quay E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 5 March 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1 Edgewater Dr; 27 Edgewater Dr; 30 Merchants' Wharf; 80 Merchants' Wharf; 261 Queens Quay E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 5 March 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 228 units
- Related file
- 11 278118 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on four below grade levels, interspersed with approximately 330 bicycle parking spaces. The residential condominium component of the building has been designed to accommodate families of all sizes (61 % lBO, 34% 2BD and 5% 3BD).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc. · registration SM20266
261 Queens Quay East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc. · registration SM20267
261 Queens Quay East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20267: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 8 April 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.