Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
261 Queens Quay E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64634, -79.36129
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 8 April 2014 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM20266 | Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc. | 261 Queens Quay East | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 8 April 2014 – 6 January 2015 | 1 |
| SM20267 | Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc. | 261 Queens Quay East | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 8 April 2014 – 8 April 2017 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
18- Submitted 14 February 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 113763 STE 10 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 14 August 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 180841 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 January 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0106/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 31 January 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0008/20TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 15 July 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0835/19TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 5 June 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 166175 STE 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 149736 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 July 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 201991 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 May 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 153565 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 March 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 133594 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 10 March 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0287/17TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 261935 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 July 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 197383 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 January 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 111241 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 September 2011Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 11 278098 STE 28 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 September 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 278118 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 September 2009Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 09 165798 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 18 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 113763 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 February 2023 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 20 180841 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 August 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0106/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 31 January 2020 | Closed Approved |
| B0008/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 31 January 2020 | Closed Withdrawn |
| A0835/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 July 2019 | Closed Approved |
| 19 166175 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 June 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 149736 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 201991 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 20 July 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 153565 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 May 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 133594 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 24 March 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0287/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 March 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 16 261935 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 124470 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 197383 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 July 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 111241 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 January 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 278098 STE 28 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 20 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 278118 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 165798 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 September 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 124470 STE 28 SA · submitted 5 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 124470 STE 28 SA · submitted 5 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM20267 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20267: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 197383 STE 28 SA · submitted 2 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19665 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19665: Subdivision Plan, Zoning Bylaw, Affordable Rental, Commercial and Condominium Plans for 261 Queens Quay (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 197383 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: Site plan application for a mixed use building that consists of 363 residential suites with non residential gross floor area around the perimeter of the building. The total proposed gross floor area is 34910 square metres. The building is 13 storeys in height with 4 levels of underground parking an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Subdivision Plan, Zoning Bylaw, Affordable Rental, Commercial and Condominium Plans for 261 Queens Quay
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 197383 STE 28 SA · submitted 2 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 197383 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: Site plan application for a mixed use building that consists of 363 residential suites with non residential gross floor area around the perimeter of the building. The total proposed gross floor area is 34910 square metres. The building is 13 storeys in height with 4 levels of underground parking an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 197383 STE 28 SA · submitted 2 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM20267 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20267: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 197383 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: Site plan application for a mixed use building that consists of 363 residential suites with non residential gross floor area around the perimeter of the building. The total proposed gross floor area is 34910 square metres. The building is 13 storeys in height with 4 levels of underground parking an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
11 278098 STE 28 SB · submitted 20 September 2011 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 278098 STE 28 SB at 261 Queens Quay E: Create Plan of subdivision for East Bayfront -Bayside lands (Phases 1 & 2) to create 8 construction Blocks, 2 promenade Blocks and for the creation of the public roadway network (14 blocks in total on the draft plan of subdivision). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 278118 STE 28 OZ · submitted 20 September 2011 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 278118 STE 28 OZ at 261 Queens Quay E: Rezoning application to alter location of promenade and southern-most east-west public roadway of East Bayfront-Bayside Lands (Phases 1 & 2). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.