Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
27 Edgewater Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64504, -79.36336
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 14 August 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 180841 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 July 2017Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 17 201991 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 September 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 278118 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 180841 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 August 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 201991 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 20 July 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 124470 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 278118 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 September 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 124470 STE 28 SA · submitted 5 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 124470 STE 28 SA · submitted 5 March 2015 · Closed · from registration SM20267 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20267: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 124470 STE 28 SA at 261 Queens Quay E: The Site Plan Application for a 13-story mixed-use building consisting of approximately 228 residential condominium units, 3,112 sq.m. of ground floor retail (approximately 33, 497 sf), and approximately 342 vehicular parking spaces for resident, tenant and visitor use. Parking is distributed on fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
261 Queens Quay E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 278118 STE 28 OZ · submitted 20 September 2011 · Closed · from registration SM20266 (Aqualina Bayside Toronto Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20266: 261 Queens Quay East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 278118 STE 28 OZ at 261 Queens Quay E: Rezoning application to alter location of promenade and southern-most east-west public roadway of East Bayfront-Bayside Lands (Phases 1 & 2). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 261 Queens Quay East
Matched fields
- address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 261 QUEENS QUAY E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.