lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 08 143653 ESC 39 OZ

2900 Warden Ave

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
4 April 2008
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
17
16 meetings · 6 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2900 Warden Ave
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
4 April 2008
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
1,175 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

This application proposes residential building heights ranging from 7 to 25 storeys, 1,175 residential units and the expansion of the existing mall.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 17 communications · 16 meetings · 6 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Ward 37 Scarborough Centre3
  • Ward 38 Scarborough-Centre3
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt3
  • Ward 44 Scarborough East3
  • Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest1
Data table· 6 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council445 August 2011
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council334 August 2010
Ward 38 Scarborough-CentreMember of council334 August 2010
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council3322 July 2010
Ward 44 Scarborough EastMember of council3330 July 2010
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1030 July 2010

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.