lobbyTO

Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas

2900 Warden Ave

Registrations naming this address
9
3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
24
7 offices contacted
Applications at this address
3
4 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Location
43.79855, -79.31836
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

9

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Top 8

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt9
  • Ward 37 Scarborough Centre3
  • Ward 38 Scarborough-Centre3
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt3
  • Ward 44 Scarborough East3
  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt2
  • Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest1
Data table· 7 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council971 November 2017
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council334 August 2010
Ward 38 Scarborough-CentreMember of council334 August 2010
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council3322 July 2010
Ward 44 Scarborough EastMember of council3330 July 2010
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council2213 May 2019
Ward 36 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1030 July 2010
All registrations· 9 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM28053Malibu Investment Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning and Development, Combined Application18 April 2019 – 18 April 20201
SM28054Malibu Investment Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning and Development, Combined Application18 April 2019 – 18 April 20201
SM25238NYX Capital Corp.2900 Warden Avenue.Planning and Development Application, Site Plan31 October 2017 – 31 December 20171
SM24749Malibu Investments Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…21 June 2017 – 21 June 20181
SM24318Malibu Investments Inc.2900 Warden Ave.Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law3 April 2017 – 3 October 20191
SM23886Malibu Investment Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning and Development, Combined Application11 January 2017 – 24 January 20192
SM11691Malibu Investments Inc.2900 Warden AveBridlewood Planning Application - Zoning By-Law, Site Plan, Condominium; Building Permits7 May 2008 – 31 December 201610
SM11451Malibu Investment Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning Application - Rezoning28 February 2008 – 29 February 20167
SM11429Malibu Investments Inc.2900 Warden AvenuePlanning and Development, Planning Act Applications, Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan, Combi…11 February 2008 – 11 February 20100

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

3
Data table· 3 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
11 306997 ESC 39 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)8 November 2011Under Review
In progress
09 165304 ESC 39 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)2 September 2009Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
08 143653 ESC 39 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)4 April 2008Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22

7 lobbied · 14 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22: 7 lobbied and 14 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied14Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.