Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 16 152754 STE 28 SB
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 9 May 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 55 Lake Shore Blvd E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 9 May 2016
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 16 152742 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Subdivision Approval application to permit a mixed-use development, including a new office/retail building, 6 mixed-use buildings, a daycare and a TDSB elementary school integrated into the podium of the north-west block, and a public park encompassing the entirety of the south-west block.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36592 · 29 April 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM36584 · 28 April 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd. East.”
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36313 · 28 January 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM32399 · 6 October 2021 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.