Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 16 270602 STE 28 SA
2 Cooper Street; 15 Cooper St; 15 Freeland St; 33 Freeland St; 43 Freeland St; 53 Freeland Street; 55 Cooper St; 55 John M Tinsley St; 55 Lake Shore Blvd E; 95 Lake Shore Blvd E; 99 Lake Shore Blvd E; 138 Downes St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2 Cooper Street; 15 Cooper St; 15 Freeland St; 33 Freeland St; 43 Freeland St; 53 Freeland Street; 55 Cooper St; 55 John M Tinsley St; 55 Lake Shore Blvd E; 95 Lake Shore Blvd E; 99 Lake Shore Blvd E; 138 Downes St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 23 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 16 152742 STE 28 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for Block 2 - 2 mixed-use towers (79 and 80 storeys) with a 12 storey podium.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36592 · 29 April 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM36584 · 28 April 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd. East.”
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM36313 · 28 January 2025 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
- Menkes 55 Lakeshore Inc.SM32399 · 6 October 2021 · “55 Lake Shore Blvd East”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM22338 · 16 October 2015 · “2 Cooper Street”
- Menkes Developments LtdSM22338 · 16 October 2015 · “53 Freeland Street”
- Greenland Group (Canada)SM20024 · 19 January 2014 · “2 Cooper Street”
- Greenland Group (Canada)SM20025 · 19 January 2014 · “2 Cooper Street”
- Greenland Group (Canada)SM20897 · 19 January 2014 · “2 Cooper Street.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.