Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
42 Charles St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66936, -79.38418
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 3 | 13 January 2014 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17811 | 42 Charles Street Limited | 42 Charles Street East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 15 February 2012 – 4 May 2016 | 5 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 13 August 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 206415 STE 27 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 February 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 May 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 194814 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 206415 STE 27 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 13 August 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 123110 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 February 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 194814 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 May 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
42 Charles St E · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
15 206415 STE 27 CD · submitted 13 August 2015 · Closed · from registration SM19695 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19695: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 206415 STE 27 CD at 42 Charles St E: Application for Draft Plan of Condominium related to a 56 storey building containing 465 residential units, and 4 levels of below grade parking containing 141 parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 123110 STE 27 SA · submitted 21 February 2013 · Closed · from registration SM17811 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17811: 42 Charles Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SA at 42 Charles St E: Proposal for a site plan approval for a 56 storey residential tower with a total of 465 units comprising of 29,594m2 with 141 parking spots, 6 of which are for visitors. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
13 123110 STE 27 SA · submitted 21 February 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19695 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19695: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SA at 42 Charles St E: Proposal for a site plan approval for a 56 storey residential tower with a total of 465 units comprising of 29,594m2 with 141 parking spots, 6 of which are for visitors. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 194814 STE 27 OZ · submitted 13 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17811 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17811: 42 Charles Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 194814 STE 27 OZ at 42 Charles St E: Revised Rezoning application submitted December 21, 2011 for new residential condo building to permit a mixed use development with one 58-storey tower (was 186.7 metres revised to 182 metres including mechanical) containing originally 570 now 474 residential condominium units on a 4-storey podium n… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles Street East
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 194814 STE 27 OZ · submitted 13 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18197 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18197: 42 Charles Street - Rezoning application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 194814 STE 27 OZ at 42 Charles St E: Revised Rezoning application submitted December 21, 2011 for new residential condo building to permit a mixed use development with one 58-storey tower (was 186.7 metres revised to 182 metres including mechanical) containing originally 570 now 474 residential condominium units on a 4-storey podium n… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles Street - Rezoning application
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 194814 STE 27 OZ · submitted 13 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM19695 (42 Charles Street Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19695: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 194814 STE 27 OZ at 42 Charles St E: Revised Rezoning application submitted December 21, 2011 for new residential condo building to permit a mixed use development with one 58-storey tower (was 186.7 metres revised to 182 metres including mechanical) containing originally 570 now 474 residential condominium units on a 4-storey podium n… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Matched fields
- address
- 39 HAYDEN ST
- application_address
- 39 HAYDEN ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.