Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SA

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 February 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 3 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 42 Charles St E
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 21 February 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 465 units
Related file: 11 194814 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for a site plan approval for a 56 storey residential tower with a total of 465 units comprising of 29,594m2 with 141 parking spots, 6 of which are for visitors.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

42 Charles Street Limited · registration SM19695
42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19695: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SA at 42 Charles St E: Proposal for a site plan approval for a 56 storey residential tower with a total of 465 units comprising of 29,594m2 with 141 parking spots, 6 of which are for visitors. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Matched fields
address
42 CHARLES ST
application_address
42 CHARLES ST E
42 Charles Street Limited · registration SM17811
42 Charles Street East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17811: 42 Charles Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 123110 STE 27 SA at 42 Charles St E: Proposal for a site plan approval for a 56 storey residential tower with a total of 465 units comprising of 29,594m2 with 141 parking spots, 6 of which are for visitors. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles Street East
Matched fields
address
42 CHARLES ST E
application_address
42 CHARLES ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 3 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale5
Office of Councillor K. Wong-Tam1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	5	3	13 January 2014
Office of Councillor K. Wong-Tam	Councillor staff	1	0	4 June 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Aird & Berlis LLP2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=3)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.