Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 15 206415 STE 27 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 13 August 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 42 Charles St E
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 13 August 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 465 units
- Related file
- 11 194814 STE 27 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Application for Draft Plan of Condominium related to a 56 storey building containing 465 residential units, and 4 levels of below grade parking containing 141 parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
42 Charles Street Limited · registration SM19695
42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19695: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 206415 STE 27 CD at 42 Charles St E: Application for Draft Plan of Condominium related to a 56 storey building containing 465 residential units, and 4 levels of below grade parking containing 141 parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 42 Charles St., 39 Hayden St. and Part of 50 Charles St.
Matched fields
- address
- 42 CHARLES ST
- application_address
- 42 CHARLES ST E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor K. Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 4 June 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 42 Charles Street LimitedSM17811 · 15 February 2012 · “42 Charles Street East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.