Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
322 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64678, -79.38948
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
10These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 18 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 64 | 41 | 11 February 2016 |
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 10 | 5 | 8 May 2014 |
| Adam Vaughan | Councillor staff | 9 | 6 | 30 September 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 9 | 7 | 8 May 2014 |
| Adam Vaughan Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 7 | 7 | 30 September 2013 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 7 | 4 | 7 July 2014 |
| Ward 18 Davenport | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 7 July 2014 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 4 | 3 | 10 December 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 10 May 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Vaughan, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 3 | 3 | 9 April 2014 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 11 December 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Michael Thompson, Ward 37 | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 7 July 2014 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 12 December 2013 |
| Councillor Karen Stintz, Ward 16 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 11 December 2013 |
| Office of Councillor Ana Bailao, Warde 18 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 7 July 2014 |
| Office of Councillor Norm Kelly, Ward 40 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 10 December 2013 |
| Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 October 2013 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 October 2013 |
All registrations· 10 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM18870 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 24 January 2013 – 9 April 2015 | 3 |
| SM18626 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 0 |
| SM18627 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 0 |
| SM18628 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 2 |
| SM18629 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 0 |
| SM18630 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 0 |
| SM18631 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 November 2012 – 1 November 2014 | 0 |
| SM18586 | Ed Mirvish Enterprise Ltd. | 322 King St W | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 October 2012 – 1 June 2021 | 38 |
| SM18588 | Ed Mirvish Enterprises Limited | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning a… | 1 October 2012 – 3 May 2021 | 34 |
| SM18246 | Projectcore Inc. | 322 King Street West | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 July 2012 – 10 May 2021 | 55 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 26 April 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 138389 STE 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 December 2021Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 21 244217 STE 10 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 232282 STE 10 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 21 December 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 271107 STE 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 June 2016Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 16 172771 STE 20 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 April 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 134596 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 November 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 138389 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 April 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 244217 STE 10 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 2 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 232282 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 29 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 18 271107 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 December 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 172771 STE 20 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 13 June 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 134596 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 1 April 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 12 276890 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 November 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18246 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18246: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18586 (Ed Mirvish Enterprise Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18586: 260, 266, 276, 284,300,322 King St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284,300,322 King St W
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18588 (Ed Mirvish Enterprises Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18588: Development of 266 to 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development of 266 to 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18626 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18626: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18627 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18627: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18628 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18628: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18629 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18629: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18630 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18630: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18631 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18631: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18843 (IATSE Local 58)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18843: we wish to seek information and voice our opinion on the Mirvish Development Proposal, 266 - 322 King St West. Particularly, the impact that the proposed demolition of the Princess of Wales Theatre will have on the Arts and Culture community and the jobs (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: we wish to seek information and voice our opinion on the Mirvish Development Proposal, 266 - 322 King St West. Particularly, the impact that the proposed demolition of the Princess of Wales Theatre will have on the Arts and Cultur…
Matched fields
- address
- 266-322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 266-270 KING ST W
266-270 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 276890 STE 20 OZ · submitted 9 November 2012 · Closed · from registration SM18870 (Projectcore Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18870: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ at 266-270 King St W: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 266 -322 King Street west for the purposes of a new mixed use development on two parcels. The East Parcel would be developed with an 85 storey mixed use building. The West Parcel would be developed with a 95 storey m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 260, 266, 276, 284, 300 and 322 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 322 KING ST W
- application_address
- 322 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.