Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 138389 STE 10 OZ
260 King St W; 266 King St W; 266-270 King St W; 268 King St W; 270 King St W; 276 King St W; 284 King St W; 284A King St W; 300 King St W; 322 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 260 King St W; 266 King St W; 266-270 King St W; 268 King St W; 270 King St W; 276 King St W; 284 King St W; 284A King St W; 300 King St W; 322 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 26 April 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 12 276890 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Lifting of the H
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- FitzroviaSM36319 · 3 February 2025 · “260 King St W.”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18870 · 24 January 2013 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18626 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18627 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18628 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18629 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18630 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18631 · 2 November 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Ed Mirvish Enterprise Ltd.SM18586 · 22 October 2012 · “322 King St W”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18535 · 10 October 2012 · “300 King Street West”
- Ed Mirvish Enterprises LimitedSM18588 · 1 October 2012 · “322 King Street West”
- Projectcore Inc.SM18246 · 4 July 2012 · “322 King Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.