lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 134596 STE 20 SA

260 King St W; 266 King St W; 268 King St W; 270 King St W; 274 King St W; 276 King St W; 284 King St W; 284A King St W; 300 King St W; 322 King St W

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
1 April 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
260 King St W; 266 King St W; 268 King St W; 270 King St W; 274 King St W; 276 King St W; 284 King St W; 284A King St W; 300 King St W; 322 King St W
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
1 April 2016
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
2 units
Related file
12 276890 STE 20 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Revised Site Plan application for a mixed-use development with residential, retail, commercial and institutional uses on two blocks at 260 to 322 King Street West. The east block is proposed to be developed with a 74 storey building (262 metres) and the west parcel is proposed to be developed with an 84 storey building (300 metres). The proposal includes the conservation of heritage buildings on the east and west blocks including the Royal Alexandra Theatre on the east block and the Eclipse Whitewear building, the exterior elements of the Anderson building and the Princess of Wales Theatre on the west block. A total of 2.034 dwelling units are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied1651,881100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.