32-50 Forest Manor Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 14; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Location: 43.77173, -79.34479
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 32 FOREST MANOR RD.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 23 April 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0347/21NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 18 December 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 230631 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 December 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 230637 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 December 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 230642 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 27 November 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 267829 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 25 September 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 238510 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 December 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 270214 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 23 November 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 255115 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 1 November 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 245505 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 23 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 211866 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 30 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 230503 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 20 August 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 209904 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 24 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 179745 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 November 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 269119 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 14 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0347/21NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	23 April 2021	Closed Approved
20 230631 NNY 17 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	18 December 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 230637 NNY 17 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	18 December 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
20 230642 NNY 17 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	18 December 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 267829 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	27 November 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 238510 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	25 September 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 270214 NNY 33 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	22 December 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 255115 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	23 November 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 245505 NNY 33 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	1 November 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 211866 NNY 33 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	23 August 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 230503 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	30 September 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 209904 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	20 August 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 179745 NNY 33 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	24 June 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 269119 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	22 November 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17

2 lobbied · 54 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17: 2 lobbied and 54 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	54	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17

14 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17: 14 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	14	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17

13 lobbied · 16 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17: 13 lobbied and 16 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.