lobbyTO

Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 20 230642 NNY 17 CD

32-50 Forest Manor Rd; 36 Forest Manor Rd

Ward 17 · Shelley CarrollDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
18 December 2020
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses
32-50 Forest Manor Rd; 36 Forest Manor Rd
Ward
Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Submitted
18 December 2020
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
372 units
Related file
16 255115 NNY 33 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft plan of standard condominium application for a 33-storey residential building with 372 units, 306 parking spaces, and 55 visitor parking spaces. This building is known as 32 Forest Manor Road (Block C, Building C3 of the Parkway Forest redevelopment). Related site plan application is under file 16 255115 NNY 33 SA. Related active applications include condominium applications for 36 Parkway Manor Road (Building C1, 20 230631 NNY 17 CD) and 38 Forest Manor Road (Building C2, 20 230637 NNY 17 CD).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%
Data table· 2 rows
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied28—100% (n=3)0%0%0.04
Matched, unlobbied95—100% (n=6)0%0%0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.