Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 245505 NNY 33 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 November 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 32-50 Forest Manor Rd
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 1 November 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 4,734 units
- Related file
- 16 211866 NNY 33 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application to amend the Official Plan and Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan to permit an increase in density (Floor Space Index) on the Mixed Use Areas lands from 3.5 FSI to 4.1 FSI and amend the Zoning By-law to permit an increase in gross floor area from 377,431 square metres to 413,616 square metres, an increase in the number of dwelling units from 4,344 to 4,727 units and an increase in non-residential gross floor area from 4,000 square metres to 5,370 square metres, The proposed gross floor area and dwelling units would be located on the Block C lands fronting Don Mills Road, Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road. No amendments are proposed to the approved massing and built form.Revision to the application to permit an increase in density (Floor Space Index) on the Mixed Use Areas lands from 3.5 FSI to 3.99 FSI and amend the Zoning By-law to permit an increase in gross floor area from 377,431 square metres to 412,157 square metres, an increase in the number of dwelling units from 4,344 to 4,734 units and an increase in non-residential gross floor area from 4,000 square metres to 5,470 square metres.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.