Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 11 306997 ESC 39 SA

2900 Warden Ave

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 8 November 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 2900 Warden Ave
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 8 November 2011
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 08 143653 ESC 39 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

INACTIVE

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Malibu Investment Inc.
SM28053 · 18 April 2019 · “2900 Warden Avenue”
Malibu Investment Inc.
SM28054 · 18 April 2019 · “2900 Warden Avenue”
NYX Capital Corp.
SM25238 · 31 October 2017 · “2900 Warden Avenue.”
Malibu Investments Inc.
SM24749 · 21 June 2017 · “2900 Warden Avenue”
Malibu Investments Inc.
SM24318 · 3 April 2017 · “2900 Warden Ave.”
Malibu Investment Inc.
SM23886 · 11 January 2017 · “2900 Warden Avenue”
Malibu Investments Inc.
SM11691 · 7 May 2008 · “2900 Warden Ave”
Malibu Investment Inc.
SM11451 · 28 February 2008 · “2900 Warden Avenue”
Malibu Investments Inc.
SM11429 · 11 February 2008 · “2900 Warden Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22

7 lobbied · 14 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22: 7 lobbied and 14 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	14	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.