Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

25 Richmond St E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 14; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.65194, -79.37712
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Great Gulf Group of CompaniesSM17362 · 24 October 201113
Great Gulf Group of CompaniesSM19118 · 26 March 20131

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale14

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	14	14	21 August 2014

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM19118	Great Gulf Group of Companies	25 Richmond Street East	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	26 March 2013 – 20 May 2015	1
SM17362	Great Gulf Group of Companies	25 Richmond Street East	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	24 October 2011 – 16 December 2022	13

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 16 December 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 229630 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 10 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 234834 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 10 October 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 234849 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 3 October 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1051/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 24 December 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 281191 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 2 July 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 197153 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
20 229630 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	16 December 2020	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 234834 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	10 October 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 234849 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	10 October 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A1051/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	3 October 2019	Closed Approved
13 281191 STE 28 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	24 December 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 197153 STE 28 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	2 July 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

20 Lombard St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
13 197153 STE 28 OZ · submitted 2 July 2013 · Closed · from registration SM19118 (Great Gulf Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19118: Rezoning of 25 Richmond Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 197153 STE 28 OZ at 20 Lombard St: To propose a mixed use development with the preservation and restoration of the four storey heritage building and the construction of a new 50 storey tower containing street related retail uses and residential above. The new building contains a four storey podium and is composed of two distinct but… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning of 25 Richmond Street East
Matched fields
address
25 RICHMOND ST E
application_address
25 RICHMOND ST E

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide