Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 19 234834 STE 13 CD

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 10 October 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 20 Lombard St; 25 Richmond St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 10 October 2019
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 528 units
Related file: 13 281191 STE 28 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

25 Richmond St EastDraft Plan of Standard Condominium for a 46-storey mixed use building. This Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application will include 528 residential dwelling units within the building. Note: A concurrent Draft Plan of Standard Condominium Application has been submitted for this property under Application No. 19 234849 STE 13 CD (20 and 26 Lombard St). Previous approvals include Zoning By-law Amendment (Application 13 197153 STE 28 OZ), Site Plan Approval (Application 13 281191 STE 28 SA) and Minor Variance (Application A1133/17TEY). An OMB Order for the rezoning of the site was issued on January 22, 2016 (City of Toronto By-law 132-2016 (OMB) and 133-2016 (OMB).A minor variance application was approved on February 12, 2020 (A1051/19TEY) to increase the number of dwelling units to 693, and increase the maximum total and residential GFA. Variances for parking spaces were also granted.A minor variance application was approved on February 17, 2021 (A0855/20TEY) to increase the number of dwelling units to 694, and increase the maximum total and residential GFA. Variances for parking spaces were also granted.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM19118 · 26 March 2013 · “25 Richmond Street East”
Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM17362 · 24 October 2011 · “25 Richmond Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.