Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
2180 Lawrence Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Location
- 43.74798, -79.28444
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 27 September 2016 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23564 | Lalu Canada | 2180 Lawrence Ave. E. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 27 September 2016 – 27 February 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 11 September 2025Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 25 224219 ESC 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 April 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0088/24SCClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 17 December 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 262428 ESC 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 December 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 274213 ESC 37 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 October 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 242481 ESC 37 SAUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 224219 ESC 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 September 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0088/24SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 April 2024 | Closed Withdrawn |
| 19 262428 ESC 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 274213 ESC 37 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 242481 ESC 37 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 October 2016 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2180 Lawrence Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 274213 ESC 37 OZ · submitted 11 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM23564 (Lalu Canada)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23564: Applications in support of redevelopment of 2180 Lawrence Ave. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 274213 ESC 37 OZ at 2180 Lawrence Ave E: Proposal for a mixed-use development consisting of a 21 storey building including 564 sm of retail space(at the northeast corner of Lawrence Ave E and Birchmount Rd.), a 7 storey mid-rise building (along Birchmount Rd.), 3 blocks of stacked townhouses (for an overall total of 288 dwelling units), a… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 2180 Lawrence Ave. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 2180 LAWRENCE AVE E
- application_address
- 2180 LAWRENCE AVE E
2180 Lawrence Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 242481 ESC 37 SA · submitted 25 October 2016 · Under Review · from registration SM23564 (Lalu Canada)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23564: Applications in support of redevelopment of 2180 Lawrence Ave. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 242481 ESC 37 SA at 2180 Lawrence Ave E: INACTIVE Proposal for a mixed-use development consisting of a 21 storey building (at the northeast corner of Lawrence Ave E and Birchmount Rd.), a 5 to 7 storey mid-rise building (along Birchmount Rd.), 3 blocks of stacked townhouses (internal to the site) and a new public park (along Dulverton Rd.… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 2180 Lawrence Ave. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 2180 LAWRENCE AVE E
- application_address
- 2180 LAWRENCE AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 21
3 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21
10 lobbied · 44 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 44 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.