lobbyTO

Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle

19 Henning Ave

Registrations naming this address
4
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
78
31 offices contacted
Applications at this address
5
4 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Location
43.70666, -79.40140
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

4

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Councillor Carmichael Greb8
  • Councillor Crawford7
  • Ward 38 Scarborough Centre7
  • Councillor Thompson5
  • Councillor Holyday4
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Councillor Ainslie3
  • Ward 32 Beaches-East York3
Data table· 31 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Carmichael GrebCouncillor staff8227 June 2017
Councillor CrawfordCouncillor staff7228 June 2017
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council744 July 2017
Councillor ThompsonCouncillor staff5130 June 2017
Councillor HolydayCouncillor staff4028 June 2017
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council424 July 2017
Councillor AinslieCouncillor staff3027 June 2017
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council3227 June 2017
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council324 July 2017
Councillor De BaeremaekerCouncillor staff2110 January 2018
Councillor McMahonCouncillor staff2012 May 2017
Councillor PasternakCouncillor staff2025 May 2017
Councillor Wong-TamCouncillor staff2117 May 2017
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council2117 May 2017
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council2027 June 2017
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council2127 June 2017
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council214 July 2017
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council204 July 2017
Councillor CampbellCouncillor staff1015 May 2017
Councillor FilionCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor FletcherCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor FragedakisCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor KarygiannisCouncillor staff109 May 2017
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff1125 May 2017
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council104 July 2017
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council104 July 2017
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council1116 May 2017
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1018 May 2017
All registrations· 4 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM24532Madison Group19 Henning AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Consent …10 May 2017 – 27 March 20181
SM24501Madison Group19 Henning AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development, Combined Application9 May 2017 – 30 November 20188
SM24476Madison Group19 Henning AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development, Combined Application4 May 2017 – 26 November 201856
SM24477Madison Group19 Henning AvenuePlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development, Combined Application4 May 2017 – 30 November 201813

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

5
Data table· 5 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
24 135591 NNY 08 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)12 April 2024OMB Appeal
In progress
20 229115 NNY 08 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)14 December 2020OMB Appeal
In progress
20 126681 NNY 08 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)16 March 2020Appeal Received
In progress
16 140393 NNY 16 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)14 April 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
14 145916 NNY 16 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)23 April 2014Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied33—100% (n=3)0%12%0.00
Matched, unlobbied57—100% (n=3)0%26%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 69 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=2

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied8%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied25—100% (n=3)0%8%0.00
Matched, unlobbied69—100% (n=2)0%4%0.00
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.