lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 140393 NNY 16 OZ

17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 90 Eglinton Ave W

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
14 April 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
78
22 meetings · 31 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 90 Eglinton Ave W
Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted
14 April 2016
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
14 145916 NNY 16 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

To amend the Official Plan to permit the re-designation of 17 & 19 Henning Avenue from Neighbourhoods to Mixed-Use Areas.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 78 communications · 22 meetings · 31 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Carmichael Greb8
  • Councillor Crawford7
  • Ward 38 Scarborough Centre7
  • Councillor Thompson5
  • Councillor Holyday4
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Councillor Ainslie3
  • Ward 32 Beaches-East York3
Data table· 31 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Carmichael GrebCouncillor staff8227 June 2017
Councillor CrawfordCouncillor staff7228 June 2017
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council744 July 2017
Councillor ThompsonCouncillor staff5130 June 2017
Councillor HolydayCouncillor staff4028 June 2017
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council424 July 2017
Councillor AinslieCouncillor staff3027 June 2017
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council3227 June 2017
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council324 July 2017
Councillor De BaeremaekerCouncillor staff2110 January 2018
Councillor McMahonCouncillor staff2012 May 2017
Councillor PasternakCouncillor staff2025 May 2017
Councillor Wong-TamCouncillor staff2117 May 2017
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council2117 May 2017
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council204 July 2017
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council2027 June 2017
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council2127 June 2017
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council214 July 2017
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council204 July 2017
Councillor CampbellCouncillor staff1015 May 2017
Councillor FilionCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor FletcherCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor FragedakisCouncillor staff1011 May 2017
Councillor KarygiannisCouncillor staff109 May 2017
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff1125 May 2017
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council104 July 2017
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council104 July 2017
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council1116 May 2017
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1018 May 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied33—100% (n=2)0%12%0.00
Matched, unlobbied57—100% (n=3)0%27%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.