Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 14 145916 NNY 16 OZ
17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 90 Eglinton Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 April 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 90 Eglinton Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 23 April 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 227 units
- Related file
- 20 126681 NNY 08 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To construct 24-storey mixed-use building containing ground floor retail (approximately 682 sq. m), office space (approximately 2,931 sq. m.) and 227 residential units (approximately 15,543 m2) for a total of 19,156 m2, with three levels of below-grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Madison GroupSM24532 · 10 May 2017 · “19 Henning Avenue”
- Madison GroupSM24532 · 10 May 2017 · “90 Eglinton Avenue West”
- Madison GroupSM24501 · 9 May 2017 · “19 Henning Avenue”
- Madison GroupSM24501 · 9 May 2017 · “90 Eglinton Ave W”
- Madison GroupSM24476 · 4 May 2017 · “19 Henning Avenue”
- Madison GroupSM24477 · 4 May 2017 · “19 Henning Avenue”
- Madison GroupSM24476 · 4 May 2017 · “90 Eglinton Avenue West”
- Madison GroupSM24477 · 4 May 2017 · “90 Eglinton Avenue West”
- Madison GroupSM22115 · 12 August 2015 · “90 Eglinton Avenue West”
- Madison HomesSM17506 · 1 December 2011 · “90 Eglinton Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 27% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.