lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 20 126681 NNY 08 SA

17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 50-60 Eglinton Ave W; 90 Eglinton Ave W

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Appeal Received
In progress
Submitted
16 March 2020
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
17 Henning Ave; 19 Henning Ave; 50-60 Eglinton Ave W; 90 Eglinton Ave W
Ward
Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted
16 March 2020
Status
Appeal Received
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
688 units; 54,755 m² gross floor area
Related file
20 229115 NNY 08 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control have been revised and submitted. The initial proposal was for two towers measuring 24 storeys (90 Eglinton Ave W) and 32 storeys (50-60 Eglinton Ave W) in height. The proposal has now been amended to increase the height of the towers to 34 and 39 storeys in height atop a 3-storey mixed-use base building with 688 residential units. The development proposes a total gross floor area of 54,755 square metres, of which 2,898 square metres is proposed for retail uses and 4,048 square metres is proposed for office uses, resulting in an FSI of 13.73 times the lot area.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 70 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied8%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 70 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied25—100% (n=3)0%8%0.00
Matched, unlobbied70727100% (n=4)0%4%0.00
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.