Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
177 Caledonia Road
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.68047, -79.45660
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 177G CALEDONIA RD.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 5 | 1 | 3 April 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 11 April 2019 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 3 April 2019 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36058 | Frontdoor Developments (4700 Bathurst) Inc. | 177 Caledonia Road | Parks / Open Space; Planning and Development; Trees | 22 October 2024 – 31 July 2027 | 0 |
| SM25308 | Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc) | 177 Caledonia Road | Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 13 November 2017 – 21 October 2022 | 7 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
7- Submitted 6 July 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 180098 STE 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 August 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0631/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0204/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0205/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 1 March 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0206/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2013Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 13 281015 000 00 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 281025 WET 17 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 7 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 180098 STE 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 6 July 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0631/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 August 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0204/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0205/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
| A0206/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 1 March 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 13 281015 000 00 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 23 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 281025 WET 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
177 Caledonia Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0631/18EYK · submitted 14 August 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25308 (Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc))
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25308: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0631/18EYK at 177 Caledonia Rd: To permit a temporary sales office on a portion of the lot. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
177 Caledonia Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0204/18EYK · submitted 1 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25308 (Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc))
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25308: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0204/18EYK at 177 Caledonia Rd: To modify the gross floor area, the side yard setbacks and the terrace height of the site specific By-law 790-2015. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
177 Caledonia Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0205/18EYK · submitted 1 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25308 (Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc))
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25308: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0205/18EYK at 177 Caledonia Rd: To modify the gross floor area of the site specific By-law 790-2015. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
177 Caledonia Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0206/18EYK · submitted 1 March 2018 · Closed · from registration SM25308 (Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc))
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25308: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0206/18EYK at 177 Caledonia Rd: To modify the gross floor area of the site specific By-law 790-2015. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.