Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0205/18EYK
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 1 March 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 177 Caledonia Road
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 1 March 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 26 April 2018
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To modify the gross floor area of the site specific By-law 790-2015.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc) · registration SM25308
Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25308: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0205/18EYK at 177 Caledonia Rd: To modify the gross floor area of the site specific By-law 790-2015. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance application to be submitted for 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
- application_address
- 177 CALEDONIA RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 7 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 5 | 1 | 3 April 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 11 April 2019 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 3 April 2019 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Frontdoor Developments (4700 Bathurst St.) Inc.SM36058 · 22 October 2024 · “177 Caledonia Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.