Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Development application 13 281015 000 00 PL
19 Innes Ave; 177 Caledonia Road
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 December 2013
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
- Addresses
- 19 Innes Ave; 177 Caledonia Road
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 23 December 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 281025 WET 17 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Part Lot Control Exemption application to create a total of 41 lots: 14 lots fronting Caledonia Rd (semi-detached dwellings), 14 lots fronting McRoberts Ave (semi-detached dwellings), and 13 lots fronting Innes Ave (10 semi-detached dwellings and 3 row houses). Common Element Condominium application 21 180098 STE 09 CD has been submitted and will be reviewed concurrently.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Frontdoor Developments (4700 Bathurst St.) Inc.SM36058 · 22 October 2024 · “177 Caledonia Road”
- Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “177 Caledonia Road”
- Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “19 Innes Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.