Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 281025 WET 17 OZ

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 23 December 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 19 Innes Ave; 177 Caledonia Road
Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted: 23 December 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 41 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

This application at 177 Caledonia Road and 19 Innes Avenue proposes to redevelop the former Hughes Public School site with 14 semi-detached dwellings fronting Caledonia Road, 14 semi-detached dwellings fronting McRoberts Avenue, and 10 semi-detached and 3 row house dwellings fronting Innes Avenue, for a total of 41 dwellings. The dwellings are also proposed to include permission for a second suite in each at the time of construction.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Frontdoor Developments (4700 Bathurst) Inc.
SM36058 · 22 October 2024 · “177 Caledonia Road”
Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)
SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “177 Caledonia Road”
Frontdoor Developments (Caledonia Inc)
SM25308 · 13 November 2017 · “19 Innes Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9

19 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9: 19 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	19	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.