Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
1001 Sheppard Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.76911, -79.37497
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 6 | 6 | 17 May 2012 |
| Infrastructure & Development Services | City staff | 5 | 0 | 30 September 2021 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31902 | Concord Adex | 1001 Sheppard Avenue East | Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application; Water | 24 June 2021 – 31 October 2026 | 5 |
| SM22751 | Concord Adex | 1001 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 3 February 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM22753 | Concord Adex | 1001 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 3 February 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM22755 | Concord Adex | 1001 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Subdivision | 3 February 2016 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM15225 | Concord Adex Developments Limited | 1001 Sheppard Ave East | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 6 October 2010 – 25 February 2013 | 6 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
13- Submitted 29 May 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 167441 NNY 17 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 25 March 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 129384 NNY 17 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 25 March 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 129405 NNY 17 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 17 March 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 124107 NNY 17 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 3 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 220950 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 June 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 164881 NNY 17 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 December 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0670/20NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 27 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 265056 NNY 17 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 17 May 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 155827 NNY 17 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 December 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0832/18NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 November 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 263017 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 June 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0634/17NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 July 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 192524 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 13 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 167441 NNY 17 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 29 May 2025 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 24 129384 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 March 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 129405 NNY 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 March 2024 | Council Approved Approved |
| 22 124107 NNY 17 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 March 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 220950 NNY 17 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 164881 NNY 17 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 June 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0670/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 15 December 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 19 265056 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 December 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 155827 NNY 17 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 May 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0832/18NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 December 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 18 263017 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 November 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0634/17NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 June 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 15 192524 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 July 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1001 Sheppard Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 263017 NNY 24 SA · submitted 30 November 2018 · Closed · from registration SM31138 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31138: Block 11 - 11-39 McMahon Drive, North York (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 263017 NNY 24 SA at 1001 Sheppard Ave E: Two residential towers, 18 and 29 storeys with five levels of underground parking, 30 townhouses (3 storey and stacked townhouse form) which are all part of one building having access either from an internal corridor or direct access at grade. A two storey podium on the north side will connect the … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 11 - 11-39 McMahon Drive, North York
Matched fields
- address
- 11-39 MCMAHON DR
- application_address
- 25 MCMAHON DR
1001 Sheppard Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 192524 NNY 24 SA · submitted 17 July 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22751 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22751: Block 12 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East (Concord Park Place) Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 192524 NNY 24 SA at 1001 Sheppard Ave E: Site Plan application for a 4-storey, 12,343 square metre community centre including a 52-space child care facility, aquatic centre and a recreation centre with 196 parking spaces in 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 12 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East (Concord Park Place) Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
- address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
1001 Sheppard Ave E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
15 192524 NNY 24 SA · submitted 17 July 2015 · Closed · from registration SM22753 (Concord Adex)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22753: Block 15 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East Site Plan Issues (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 192524 NNY 24 SA at 1001 Sheppard Ave E: Site Plan application for a 4-storey, 12,343 square metre community centre including a 52-space child care facility, aquatic centre and a recreation centre with 196 parking spaces in 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Block 15 - Part of 1001 Sheppard Avenue East Site Plan Issues
Matched fields
- address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 1001 SHEPPARD AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17
14 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 54 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 54 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.